WHY WE ARE DIFFERENT

THREE MAIN SECURITY GAPS OF CONVENTIONAL APPROACH

TIME GAP


Automated assessments based on tools depend on signatures that take minimum 3-4 months to be updated. This creates a time gap where tests being conducted are actually looking for vulnerabilities that are 3-4 months old

CONSISTENCY GAP


Some companies get assessments done 2 or 3 times a year. This still leaves them vulnerable in between the assessments.


DYNAMIC GAP


Static part of security like policies, devices etc requires dynamic updates regularly rather than updates at discrete time intervals.


BUSINESS IMPACT OF CONVENTIONAL APPROACH

COST OF REPEATED ASSESSMENTS


Organizations carry out assessments twice or thrice a year that leads repeated cost of assessment.


REPETITIVE INVESTMENT FOR SAME VULNERABILITIES


Most of these tests are repetitive. Organizations end up paying multiple times for determining the same vulnerabilities. The investment is not smart!

HIGHER COST TO RESOLVE PILED-UP VULNERABILITIES


If assessment is carried out after a long gap, large number of vulnerabilities pile up, leading to higher cost of assessments and longer time to close the loopholes.

SOLUTION

With conventional methods companies end up spending significant money in assessments and still remain exposed to new threats. Our unique 3 layered assessment approach uncovers 60% more vulnerabilities as compared to our competitors.

AUTOMATED ASSESSMENTS


  • Scanning of IPs
  • Removing False Positives
  • Scanning Open & Filtered Ports
  • Analyzing Application/Services

SEMI-AUTOMATED ASSESSMENTS


  • Advisories For Known Vulnerabilities
  • Checking For Exportability
  • Modifying The Exploits (Shell Code)
  • Running Proof Of Concept Exploits

MANUAL ASSESSMENTS


  • Manual Fuzzing
  • Reverse Engineering
  • Simulated Code Analysis
  • Encryption Cracking